Global Engagement Solutions for Higher Education

menu
menu

How Do International Students Support Campus Internationalization?

What Is Your Campus Doing?

 

Engaging in Research to Find Better Solutions


Gary Rhodes
Associate Dean, International Education & Senior International Officer,
College of Extended & International Education
Director, Center for Global Education
California State University at Dominguez Hills

 

International students coming to the U.S. impact or can impact the internationalization that takes place on our campuses. On many U.S. campuses, a large percentage of U.S. students don't get the opportunity to study abroad. If U.S. students don’t study abroad, what other opportunities are there for international learning on campus? Some institutions require a minimum language requirement, others have a General Education requirement that focuses on issues that are global, international, and intercultural. There are also majors and minors with an international focus (international business, international relations, international education, etc.).

Although we talk about the potential for international students to provide an international perspective on our campuses, how many of us really maximize that potential? Are we bringing in students from a broad range of countries and regions around the world or only from a limited number of countries and regions? Are U.S. and international students given enough opportunities to interact in and out of the classroom? Do faculty on campus see international students in their classroom as a strength for international learning or a challenge because of limited English language skills?

Data on International Students in U.S. Colleges and Universities

According to the 2013 Institute of International Education Open Doors Report, for the 2012/2013 academic year, the largest number of international students coming to the U.S. were from (https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/Leading-Places-of-Origin/2011-13):

 

Total 819,644
China 235,597
India 96,754
South Korea 70,627
Saudi Arabia 44,566
Canada 27,357
Taiwan 21,867
Japan 19,568
Vietnam 16,098
Mexico 14,199
Turkey 11,278
Brazil 10,868
Germany 9,819
United Kingdom 9,467
Nepal 8,920
Iran 8,744
France 8,297
Hong Kong 8,026
Indonesia 7,670
Nigeria 7,316
Thailand 7,314
Malaysia 6,791
Colombia 6,543
Venezuela 6,158
Kuwait 5,115
Spain 5,033

 

What has changed isn’t just which countries are sending the most students to the U.S. to study. For many years, India and China sent the largest numbers of students to the U.S., but their numbers were close. What stands out in the 2012/13 data is that more than 25 per cent of all international students studying in the U.S. are from China. Looking back ten years to the 2002/03 data, you can see that at that time, India was sending 74,603 students to the U.S., while China was only sending 64,757. Neither Saudi Arabia, Iran, nor Kuwait was in the top 25 countries sending students to the U.S. This reflected some of the issues at the time following 9-11.

Looking 10 Years Earlier (https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/Leading-Places-of-Origin/2001-03):

 

Total 586,323
India 74,603
China 64,757
South Korea 51,519
Japan 45,980
Taiwan 28,017
Canada 26,513
Mexico 12,801
Turkey 11,601
Indonesia 10,432
Thailand 9,982
Germany 9,302
Brazil 8,388
United Kingdom 8,326
Pakistan 8,123
Hong Kong 8,078
Kenya 7,862
Colombia 7,771
France 7,223
Malaysia 6,595
Russia 6,238

 

While the overall numbers show more than 25% of all international students coming from China, on some U.S. campuses, that percentage is even larger. It used to be that the largest number of international students at U.S. campuses were graduate students. Now, of the 819,644 international students, over 50% (339,993) are graduate students (https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/By-Academic-Level-and-Place-of-Origin/2012-13).

Potential for Internationalization

Potential for International Learning in Residential Communities:

On a residential campus, where most freshmen students live on campus, many new students will live with someone they don’t know for at least one year. The potential for interactions between U.S. freshmen and new international students is great. What better way to get two 18 year-olds together than by having them live together their first year in college. However, the matching of international and domestic students doesn’t always result in a positive connection supporting international learning.

Some stereotypes and real issues deter from the potential for positive interactions between international and U.S. students that could result in international learning and lifelong friendships. I was talking to the daughter of a friend of mine. She signed up to live with someone she knew from high school for her first year in college, because: “she wanted to make sure that she didn’t have an international student as a roommate”. She was worried that the international student wouldn’t be interested in a similar college experience, wouldn’t have similar social habits, and wouldn't be able to communicate effectively in English, and would ruin her first year in college. I asked if her campus had provided her with information about support services that would support a positive opportunity of living with an international student. She said she didn’t really receive anything that made her think living with an international student was a good idea.

Many colleges and universities are struggling to find ways to maximize the potential of these interactions in the residence halls. Mentor programs, where domestic and international students are matched with support to enhance those relationships have been successful at some institutions. With the increase in the number of U.S. students studying in China, there is potential for U.S. study abroad students to connect to incoming Chinese freshmen while they are studying in China and to connect to Chinese students on campus before studying abroad to help prepare the U.S. students for study in China. However, more often, the U.S. students will receive orientation advice from other U.S. students who studied in China.

Returned study abroad students could serve as mentors for incoming international students as they may have developed cross-cultural sensitivities during their study abroad experience to allow them to be more empathetic with the issues facing international students in the U.S. and good mentors for them. However, most returned study abroad students are more interested in mentoring future U.S. study abroad students interested in study in the country and city where they studied while abroad.

When looking at the top countries where U.S. students study, some of the countries where students study abroad do match with the countries where students come from who study in the U.S. However the actual numbers nationally or on an individual campus usually do not provide an effective match with the countries and regions where international students come from.

In the 2011/12 IIE Open Doors data, following are the top 25 countries where U.S. students studied (https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/US-Study-Abroad/Leading-Destinations/2010-12):

 

Total 283,332
United Kingdom 34,660
Italy 29,645
Spain 26,480
France 17,168
China 14,887
Germany 9,370
Australia 9,324
Costa Rica 7,900
Ireland 7,640
Japan 5,283
Argentina 4,763
India 4,593
South Africa 4,540
Brazil 4,060
Mexico 3,815
Ecuador 3,572
Czech Rebpulic 3,477
Israel 3,189
Chile 3,064
New Zealand 2,969
Denmark 2,876
Greece 2,701
South Korea 2,695
Peru 2,680
Austria 2,657

 

Challenges in Bringing U.S. and International Students Together:

Although there is some crossover but not a perfect match between where U.S. students study and where international students are from has been a challenge in making crossover mentorship relationships. For U.S. students with no study abroad or other international experience, understanding what international students may offer them in terms of international learning is not simple. Like the case of the daughter of a friend who found a way to deliberately avoid living with an international student, there is work that needs to be done to support and enhance the potential of those relationships to better the international learning of both the international student and the U.S. student. Many times, international students will maintain closer relationships with other international students, many from their home country, then they will with U.S. students. I see that as a missed opportunity for international learning for both the international student and the U.S. students.

Engaging in Research to Find Better Solutions:

As discussed in previous articles, the Center for Global Education at UCLA has developed a number of resources to support integrated orientation of international students to the U.S. (uStudy.us Online Courses for International Students) and study abroad students (GlobalScholar.us Online Courses for Study Abroad). They include some resources to help connect international students and U.S. students. However, this is an area where additional resources would be helpful.

We are engaging in further research to identify some better models across the U.S. and we are confident that institutions that use Terra Dotta software have developed interesting and innovative programs to support international student and U.S. student connections to enhance the experience of international students and enhance the international learning of U.S. students who do not study abroad.

Please send any feedback about programs on your campus or other programs you are aware of at grhodes@globaled.us. Later this year, I will write a follow-up article with models of effective practice, feedback from Terra Dotta users and others and develop documents that will be shared on the Terra Dotta Community Library to support these efforts.

We often talk about ways to internationalize the home campus and support “internationalization at home” and look forward to getting your feedback to help support that effort.